Rather than discuss the substance of educational budgets and facilities, Fox made it about the Chicago teachers union’s motives for protesting school closure protests. Host Brenda Buttner set the stage with her opening, “Threatening to put their bodies on the line. The Chicago teachers union causing havoc this week protesting the proposed closing of 54 schools and 61 buildings. Union members outraged! They say kids are getting hurt.” Then she began the discussion by tossing to conservative panelist John Layfield, “But John, you say they’re just looking out for who? Themselves?”
To drive the point home, a banner on the screen read: MOTIVE OF CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION IN QUESTION AMID SCHOOL CLOSURE PROTESTS
After Layfield gave his predictable attack on the teachers union, Smith said,
The teachers don’t care about the kids. They care about having a job. That’s what they’re there for, but look what Chicago faces. Chicago faces two things. One, they say they face a billion-dollar deficit. What was their solution? I quote, ‘Consolidating underutilized schools will allow us to safely move these children to a higher-performing, welcoming school near their home with all the investments they need to thrive in the classroom.’ So how can you say that and the billion-dollar deficit and say the teachers are looking out for the kids? No, the teachers are looking out for themselves.Epstein, a News Hounds Top Dog, said, “I think Gary B. may want to consider his comment that the teachers don’t care about the kids. Every single teacher I’ve ever met loves and cares deeply about the kids. It’s possible they care about their jobs and the kids at the same time. The problem here is you do have a billion dollar debt… That comes mostly from the economic turndown and the shrinking tax base.” He questioned the consolidation as “not going to be good for the kids and it’s not going to be good for the local economy.”
Jonas Max Ferris said, “You don’t just go into teaching for the money.” However, he, too, took a jab at the teachers union (albeit reasonably) by saying, “If you want to raise the pay of teachers to make better programs, incentive pay, whatever it is, for the students’ benefit, you can make a case for that. To just pay them more than the free-market wage because they’re in a union, doesn’t really solve anything for the kids. So I think higher wages can make sense but the way the unions go about it, doesn’t solve our problems.”
Meanwhile, Fox did its part to bash the unions, public education and public school teachers – while mostly ignoring what impacts the closures will have on the children.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/v8_p9eK5Qfo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>